The aerodrome traffic circuit is defined as a special pattern (standard or non-standard) that is used by traffic to fly to and away from the runway in use at an airfield.
The tower controller is responsible for the traffic flow that goes through the traffic pattern. He has an important role at the airport operation; his position will guarantee a proper sequencing of the arrivals and the relation with the departures. All of these manoeuvres will affect the efficiency and safety of the active runways and the aerodrome.
In this document, we will use
In this aerodrome, you can find:
A clearance shall be given to any pilot who wants to enter into the aerodrome traffic circuit. It is important to be aware about the conditions to give a clearance to join the traffic circuit.
An aircraft shall not enter into the aerodrome traffic circuit without a clearance if there is an active ATC operating and giving air traffic control service.
The radio contact between aircraft and tower controller shall be initiated by the pilot before beginning any entry of an aerodrome traffic circuit even if the associated class of space (like a control zone) does not require a preliminary radio contact.
The aircraft in the aerodrome circuit have priority over other aircraft outside the circuit. The entry could be possible in several manners:
The first possibility of aircraft integration into the circuit is to integrate it on downwind leg.
In function of the position of the aircraft, you can instruct the aircraft to join at the beginning or at the middle of the downwind leg.
Example with no traffic in the circuit (No VPNNG):
Example with an aircraft already on crosswind leg in the aerodrome circuit:
Example with an aircraft already on downwind leg in the aerodrome circuit. Instruction to join middle of downwind leg shall not be given to VPLEL due to the fact that he will join the middle of downwind with possible separation conflict with VPNNG:
Traffic information is always mandatory between VFR flights to ensure their own separation in the aerodrome circuit, in class C, D, E airspace.
Example with an aircraft already on downwind leg in the aerodrome circuit but enough separation is available to integrate the aircraft VPLEL at the middle of downwind.
Note: At this stage, it is not necessary to give traffic information to aircraft VPNNG as the other aircraft will join the circuit behind him. (pilots can't look behind their aircraft)
Another possibility of aircraft integration into the circuit is to integrate it on base leg. This is sometime called a "semi-direct approach" in some countries.
This clearance allows shortening the trajectory of the aircraft which are in a sector closer to the base than to the beginning of the downwind branch.
However, because of the complexity of the traffic either to optimize or simplify the sequence, the controller remains free to propose or to refuse a semi direct approach.
Example with no traffic in the circuit (no VPNNG):
Example with an aircraft already on downwind leg in the aerodrome circuit:
In the example above, pay attention that the aircraft VPLEL will arrive first on base with enough separation. In the example below, the integration on base is impossible; the aircraft VPLEL will join at the same time as aircraft VPNNG. Since VPNNG is already in the aerodrome circuit, he has priority.
Example with an aircraft already on downwind leg in the circuit. Instruction to join base leg shall not be given to VPLEL:
With that instruction, you leave the incoming aircraft manage its own separation behind the aircraft already in the aerodrome circuit.
Another possibility of aircraft integration into the circuit is to integrate it on final leg. This is called a "straight- in approach".
This clearance allows shortening the trajectory of the aircraft which are in a sector closer to the runway axis (angle not more than 30°) than to the base leg or downwind leg.
However, because of the complexity of the traffic either to optimize or simplify the sequence, the controller remains free to propose or to refuse a semi direct approach.
Example with no traffic inside the circuit:
Example with an aircraft already on base leg:
In the example above; pay attention that the aircraft VPLEL will arrive on final first. In the example below, the integration on final is impossible; the aircraft VPLEL will join at the same time as aircraft VPNNG. Since VPNNG is already in the aerodrome circuit, he has priority.
Example with an aircraft already on base leg in the circuit. Instruction to join final leg shall not be given to VPLEL:
Note: In addition to the current situation, the aircraft VPLEL position is also not favourable to make a straight-in approach.
The air traffic controller has the authority to use the other side of the airfield without a published aerodrome circuit.
He can use it if there are no constraints like regulations, noise reduction, prohibited or restricted areas:
Example with two aircraft already on downwind leg in the aerodrome circuit :
Note: At this stage, it is important to specify for each aircraft the aerodrome traffic leg and his hand where he is at present, as there are many cases of confusion.
If the arriving aircraft is on the other side of the aerodrome circuit, this aircraft should cross the runway axis before joining the aerodrome circuit downwind.
This crossing operation should be done with providing traffic information if there is any traffic on the runway, on final or in the aerodrome circuit.
Example with one aircraft :
Note: In this configuration, a direct integration on final or on base is not operational.
The tower controller should be able to handle the traffic (several aircraft) at the aerodrome circuit; it is really important for him to be familiarized with the aerodrome procedures and the local regulations.
In order to manage the VFR flights inside the aerodrome circuit, the tower controller will use the downwind leg report and final position report.
The crosswind leg report and the base leg position report are facultative. They are used only when necessary. The main reason for not using them is that these legs are very short and the pilot will go to the next leg in a short period of time. There is no reason to have 2 position reports in a short period of time: it is unwanted frequency messages that increase the tower controller workload with no additional value.
The goal of downwind report for a tower controller is to know when the aircraft will be in parallel direction of the runway. The aircraft will be stable at constant altitude, heading and speed. That implies that traffic on downwind leg will not be an obstacle for the runway landings and taking-off.
The goal of final report for a tower controller is to know that the aircraft is on final, stabilized and in configuration to land and ready to get the landing clearance.
Example with one aircraft at holding point:
After a while, when the aircraft reaches the next position (black aircraft):
Example with one aircraft on downwind leg:
After a while, when the aircraft reaches the next position:
Note: The tower controller can use "touch and go", "low pass" and "stop and go" clearances instead of landing clearance.
With only one aircraft, the management is simple. But when there is more than one aircraft, the situation is not so simple. The aerodrome shall use traffic information as separation method in an aerodrome circuit (class C, D, E airspace).
Traffic information is important in order to achieve proper separation.
Example with two aircraft on aerodrome circuit:
In the above clearance, VPLEL has to report on final runway 36. So, the tower controller lets this aircraft turn to final. It is of no use giving traffic information due to traffic behind him.
There is no need to give traffic information to an aircraft about another aircraft behind him, except during overtaking manoeuvres (for example: traffic at 5, 6 or 7 o'clock).
No traffic information to give to VPLEL as traffic will be behind him during its touch and go.
No need to repeat the traffic information. The aircraft VPNNG doesn't lose the visual during his downwind leg. The "number two" is given to confirm that he is number two for landing and must pay attention to maintain enough separation with the traffic ahead.
The tower controller will find several aircraft throughout daily operation: IFR aircraft could get mixed with VFR traffic established in the aerodrome circuit.
With IFR traffic, the tower controller will face many types of aircraft from the lightest aircraft (like Cessna 172 or Piper J3) to the heaviest aircraft (like Boeing 777, 747 or Airbus 330, 380).
The tower controller must apply sufficient separation between all landing traffic in function of the wake turbulence category of preceding aircraft.
Example with two aircraft:
To ensure separation, traffic information to the VFR aircraft is mandatory:
After a while, there is the new situation:
The A330 is cleared to land no further clearance needed for this aircraft
The C172 is on downwind leg, we expect his call back or tower controller can give integration instruction before position report like the example.
📡 VPNNG, number 2, behind Airbus 3 3 0 short final runway 3 6, report final runway 3 6
🛩️ Number 2, Will report final runway 3 6, VPNNG
Note: With this instruction, aircraft VPNNG shall take his base leg with enough separation with preceding traffic through a little extension of the downwind leg. Tower controller shall take this separation manoeuver into account when giving control instructions.
After a while, there is the new situation:
Note the message priority :
Give the instruction to the aircraft which uses the runway first (landing, taking-off)
Then give the instruction to the aircraft flying
Then give instruction to the aircraft on ground at the end.
In case of IFR arrival sequence at short distance, the tower controller cannot integrate the VFR flight without taking the risk of an IFR go-around (which can imply extra fuel cost for a company). In case of sequence with 1 to 3 IFR maximum, the tower controller can use the downwind extension.
Pay attention to the fact that this type of clearance shall imply the possibility to any VFR to enter in this area. Sometimes due to restricted/forbidden zones, big cities areas, or regulation constraints, this type of manoeuver is forbidden.
At this time, the second IFR aircraft enters the tower controller area:
Note: We must not give the landing clearance to the aircraft AFR387, due to the previous landing clearance given: the runway is reserved for TAS6218 landing. The runway will be available for landing when previous aircraft have vacated the runway on the ground or the runway axis after a going around procedure.
During the extended downwind manoeuvre, the VFR flight must maintain the airfield in sight with the runway all the time. Check current weather before giving this instruction.
If there is a regulation with more than 2/3 IFR flight, the extended downwind procedure is not adequate due to the fact that the extended downwind leg will be very long and the risk of losing visual will be very high.
When the first aircraft (A330) is behind the VFR traffic, it's time to give other traffic information in order to make separation with the second IFR (AFR387):
ㅤ
Note: The VFR report on base leg will inform the controller that the VFR traffic will turn into the runway and does not continue on downwind. The tower controller will give further clearance in function of the situation at hand.
During an extended downwind manoeuvre, the VFR aircraft shall not leave the tower controller airspace. The controller shall ensure that any arriving VFR aircraft will fly inside the control zone or inside his area of responsibility.
There are situations within your controlled area, as a tower controller, you cannot integrate one or several of your aircraft established on your aerodrome circuit due to the following reasons:
In this case, the controller has no choice but to give a holding clearance to the aircraft which cannot continue on the present heading or current instruction or clearance.
Holding instruction for VFR traffic is an orbit clearance (i.e. making a 360° turn).
There are several locations for a VFR flight to hold:
The orbit clearance will not be given on base leg or on final except for safety reasons.
Example with two aircraft:
As tower controller, you cannot integrate the C172 on final due to possible conflict (two aircraft arriving on final at the same time). In order to maintain enough separation, you can order the VFR flight to hold at the present position:
Note: In this example, orbiting by the right is dangerous due to the proximity of the runway and landing traffics.
During the orbiting manoeuvre, the air traffic controller shall monitor that the orbiting aircraft will not move too close to another aircraft or to the runway axis.
Example with two aircraft:
At this present time, you cannot let aircraft VPLEL continue his flight on downwind leg in order to prevent making a stack of aircraft at downwind leg. At this stage, aircraft VPLEL shall quit the downwind in order to avoid collision and limit the number of aircraft holding near the runway.
In some situation, you will give traffic advisories to inbound traffic and the answer of the pilot will be: "traffic not in sight".
If the incoming aircraft is far enough, you can let this traffic continue and await the "traffic in sight" report. But there is some situation that separation cannot be maintained due to the fact the second pilot does not see the preceding aircraft.
The reasons for not seeing traffic can be:
This situation can occur many times with random occurrence. The controller must be prepared to handle this type of situation.
The basic solution of this situation is to instruct the pilot to hold near a strategic point. A pilot who cannot see any traffic shall be handled like he is alone in the air; you must provide him sufficient space behind preceding traffic in order to prevent collision.
Example with two aircraft:
VPNNG on end of downwind runway 36
VPLEL at the middle of downwind
Letter E is a published VFR point on charts
📡 VPLEL, join middle of right hand downwind runway 3 6, number 2 behind Cessna 1 7 2 at end of downwind runway 3 6, report downwind
🛩️ Will join middle of right hand downwind Runway 3 6, number 2, traffic not in sight, will report downwind, VPLEL
📡 VPLEL, report traffic in sight
🛩️ Wilco
If there is enough separation between two aircraft, the tower controller can let the aircraft integrate on downwind. With that, the tower controller gives the aircraft more time to look around in order to find the traffic:
You cannot let aircraft VPLEL continue his flight on downwind leg when he cannot ensure his separation with the traffic ahead (traffic not in sight). At this stage, aircraft VPLEL shall leave the downwind in order to prevent collision and ensure safe operations near the runway.
In function of traffic localization, you can give an orbit instruction outside the aerodrome circuit when necessary. This instruction can be given before aircraft integration if the separation is not compatible with the situation.
Sometimes as tower controller, you will face a situation that a slow VFR aircraft is on long final and needs some minutes to land and behind him there is an IFR aircraft which is only 3 to 5 NM behind.
In order to avoid a probable go around for IFR, it is sometimes necessary to give a go around clearance to the VFR aircraft to let IFR aircraft land without delay.
There is no "IFR" priority over "VFR" in the regulation but, when an IFR aircraft is going around, it will lose about 15 minutes minimum flying time to re-join the final again. The same go around clearance given to the VFR traffic will lose about 5 minutes flying time only. In the real world, the efficiency is better in the second case to give a go around and new integration instructions to the VFR aircraft.
Example:
At this stage, the tower controller must evaluate the situation and answer the question: "Does VFR traffic have time to land and vacate the runway before the IFR aircraft will arrive on short final (<2NM)". If the answer is no, a go around shall be given to one of the aircraft without delay.
In this situation the tower controller gives a go around clearance to the VFR aircraft:
Note: If there is traffic on downwind that makes any VFR integration on the aerodrome circuit difficult, the go-around can be instructed on the other side.
Sometimes as tower controller, you will face a situation that an aircraft on short final (less than 2NM from runway threshold) and the runway is still occupied (not vacated).
You cannot give any landing clearance to an aircraft when the runway is occupied (aircraft, ground vehicles, animals, persons ....).
Any pilot on short final can decide himself, without any coordination with controller, to make a go around if he sees that the runway is not cleared.
As tower controller if there is an aircraft on short final (less than 2NM from runway threshold), you shall give without delay a go around clearance, except if you initiate a negotiation with the pilot in command in order to give a "late landing clearance" just before the runway threshold.
Example:
After a while, you will obtain the situation showed at the left:
Note: Tower controller shall also when possible inform the VFR pilot that he has to vacate the runway as soon as possible due to traffic on final.
The departure flow should be handled in the order in which they are ready for take-off.
But, there are several factors that can modify a pre-determined departure sequence:
Once a departure sequence has been established on the taxiway scheme, it can be difficult to change the pre-existing order.
When departing the traffic pattern, VFR aircraft should continue beyond the departure end of the runway after reaching pattern altitude using:
Pilots need to be aware of any traffic entering the traffic pattern prior to starting a turn; traffic information is vital to complete the operation safely.
In some cases, a straight out or 45° departure will not be possible. The tower controller can use the downwind leg as an initial safe departure before continuing to the destination airfield.
After a while:
The tower controller should be aware that priorities will exist under certain conditions. It is important to evaluate all the factors and determine if these situations could affect the traffic flow and its safety.
Flight priority shall be given to:
It is important to know that an aircraft landing or in the final stage of an approach to land, normally, will have priority over an aircraft intending to depart from the same runway. In the aerodrome circuit, if there is no specific case like the examples above, the priority shall be:
With IVAO ATC software software, IVAO provides the use of radar coverage. The tower controller's primary function with radar is to visually scan the airport and local area.
With using radar information, the controller should enhance the efficiency of the tower control.
Radar information is not intended to provide radar services at tower level.
The tower controller can use the radar information:
The tower controller shall never use the radar information: